PolitiPost: Obama vs. Romney

Tonight’s debate: the first in this Presidential race and the first I’ve ever watched.  President Obama went head to head with Governor Romney.

Romney came off in a falsely confident, overzealous, arrogant and aggressive manner.  Problem is, I just spent over an hour watching Mitt Romney numerically bullet point his vague ideas and plans for America, and still only have vague ideas about his platform.  Not to mention, Romney’s increased tone was distasteful each time he disrespected the moderator, and his nonverbals said to me that he was unsure (the smirk, raised eyebrows, blinking lashes, lack of eye contact) of his own plan of action.

Tonight, Romney made several contradictory statements, particularly regarding education and taxes.  According to Romney, he will not cut the education budget.  Instead, he proposed to shift the responsibility of education to state and local levels, to “grade” schools – to allow students’ parents to choose where they send their kids to school, and to allow federal education dollars to follow children to schools of their parents’ choice.  Inherently, Romney’s plan is flawed and contradictory.

Should his intent be to shift the responsibility of education to state and local levels, he’s [indirectly] declaring a cut on federal spending for education.  That’s not a hard point to see.  Through Romney’s approach, allowing “school selection,” he is proposing that good school districts risk being overflowed with children from poorer districts.  Problem is, how are class sizes kept minimal, and when the school district needs expansion, who pays for it?  The taxpayers he won’t raise taxes on?

Regarding taxes, Romney claimed he wouldn’t increase taxes, rather he’d close loopholes and deductions.  How exactly does this work in favor of taxpayers?  This plan, in essence, requires more out-of-pocket for taxpayers.  In addition, Governor Romney stated he’d lower the corporate tax rate from 35% to 25% (as opposed to Obama raising it to 40%), before saying “maybe I need a new accountant” when Obama suggested there were tax breaks in place for companies outsourcing jobs – is/has Mitt Romney been part of a company responsible for outsourcing jobs/work?  His present-tense comment would suggest as much.

Finally, Governor Romney directly stated he’d cut funding for the Public Broadcast System (PBS) – a television network responsible for educational and cultural programming such as Sesame Street, Nature, or any one of the many fundraising concerts broadcast throughout the year.  PBS is a supporter of a various programs that promote and benefit education and support underprivileged youth.  Romney stated, “I love Big Bird,” yet his action plan would eliminate programming that has been a cornerstone in many people’s developmental and adult lives.

Romney said:

“If elected I’ll sit down on day one, actually the day after I’m elected…”

Doesn’t Governor Romney think he should win the election and then be inaugurated as the President of the United States before declaring when he’ll begin acting as the President immediately following election day?  Obama did, stating:

“…not just saying I’ll sit down, you have to have a plan…”

Conversely, President Obama remained poised while discussing talking points and highlighted things that have been accomplished during his Presidency (Obamacare, the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” Bin Laden’s capture/death, etc.).  As for his re-election bid, Obama declared his intent to increase education funding and to require more staff be implemented in the emphasis areas of math and science.  Obama took his plan a step-further, beyond primary and secondary education to post-secondary/college students.  He vowed to work to keep student loan rates low and to have agencies and companies work with colleges and universities to help emerging graduates be placed in the workforce.

Adding to his stance on education, President Obama admitted that while healthcare premiums have increased over the past two years, they have increased at a fifty year low, and defended “Obamacare” saying it doesn’t let “insurance companies jerk you around.”  He said under the “Obamacare” provisions, insurance companies will be required to provide rebates to their customers when their administrative spending exceeds spending on care provided, and that individuals may be eligible for group rates (which are an average of 18% less).  Though he received less speaking time, Obama’s vision was clear:

“Everything I’m promising…is designed to make sure the American people…get a fair shot…I promised I’d fight every single day, and I’ve kept that promise.”

VICTOR:  President Barack Obama

-Bobby-james

P.S. – the news anchor in the post-debate analysis stated that Mitt Romney appeared Obama’s equal.  I disagree.  Romney, as I stated, was overzealous and arrogant and offered no clear solutions, only propositions.

“It wasn’t very detailed, this seems to be a trend” – Obama re: Romney’s plan

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: